Energy Information Systems: From the Basement to the Boardroom

A significant buildings energy reduction opportunity exists in the office sector, given that this market segment typically is an early adopter of new technology. There is a rising trend towards smart and connected offices through the internet of things (IoT) that provides new opportunities for operational efficiency and environmental sustainability practices. Leading commercial real estate companies have begun to shift from individual building automation systems (BAS) to partially integrated and automated systems such as energy information systems (EIS). In both the United States and India, organizations are seeking operational excellence, enhanced tenant relationships, and topline growth. Hence it is imperative to engage the executives with decision-making power, by tapping into their interest in sustainability, corporate social responsibility, and innovation. This expansion of interest can enable data-driven decisions, strong energy investments, and deeper energy benefits, and would drive innovation in this field. However, none of this would be possible without robust, consistent building energy information to provide visibility across all the levels of decision making, i.e. from the basement where the facilities staff take operational action to the boardroom where the executives make investment decisions. Price, security, and ease of use remain barriers to the adoption and pervasive use of promising EIS technologies in commercial office buildings. We believe that these barriers can be addressed through the development of ready, simplified, consistent, commercially available, low-cost EIS-in-a-box packages, that have a pre-defined set of hardware components and software features and functionality that are pertinent to a particular building sector. These simplified, sector-specific EIS packages can help to obviate the need for customization, and enhance ease of use, thereby enabling scale-up, in order to facilitate building energy savings. The EIS-in-a-box are adaptable in both U.S. and Indian office buildings, and potentially beyond these two countries

Building fault detection data to aid diagnostic algorithm creation and performance testing.

It is estimated that approximately 4-5% of national energy consumption can be saved through corrections to existing commercial building controls infrastructure and resulting improvements to efficiency. Correspondingly, automated fault detection and diagnostics (FDD) algorithms are designed to identify the presence of operational faults and their root causes. A diversity of techniques is used for FDD spanning physical models, black box, and rule-based approaches. A persistent challenge has been the lack of common datasets and test methods to benchmark their performance accuracy. This article presents a first of its kind public dataset with ground-truth data on the presence and absence of building faults. This dataset spans a range of seasons and operational conditions and encompasses multiple building system types. It contains information on fault severity, as well as data points reflective of the measurements in building control systems that FDD algorithms typically have access to. The data were created using simulation models as well as experimental test facilities, and will be expanded over time

Fault “Auto-correction” for HVAC Systems: A Preliminary Study

A Fault Detection and Diagnostics (FDD) tool is a type of energy management and information system that is designed to continuously identify the presence of faults and efficiency improvement opportunities through a 1-way interface to the building automation system and application of automated analytics. It is estimated that 5-30% energy saving can be achieved by employing FDD tools and implementing efficiency measures based on FDD findings. Although the potential of this technology is high, actual savings are only realized when an operator takes an action to fix the problem. There is a subset of faults that can be potentially addressed automatically by the system, without operator intervention. Automating this fault correction can significantly increase the savings generated by FDD tools and reduce the reliance on human intervention. This paper presents preliminary efforts towards delivering automated fault correction. It describes nine fault auto-correction algorithms for heating ventilation and air conditioning (HVAC) systems that were developed to automatically correct faults or improve controls operation. It also presents preliminary testing results of one auto-correction algorithm (improve air handling unit static pressure setpoint reset) in a commercial building, located in Berkeley, California, US. The auto-correction algorithms and implementation frameworks of this initial study provide a foundation for future auto-correction algorithm development and novel schemes for improving building operation performance and reliability

Modeling Air Handling Units to Create a Diverse Fault Dataset for FDD Innovation: Lessons Learned and Recommendations

As energy management and information systems (e.g., automated fault detection and diagnostics [AFDD] tools) become more prevalent in the commercial building stock, it is important to determine the effectiveness of these technologies by benchmarking their performance. The authors have been working to develop the largest publicly available dataset of HVAC fault datasets for performance benchmarking applications, covering the most common HVAC systems and designs including chiller plants, rooftop packaged units, dual duct air handling unit and single duct air handling units. This study covers the development, modeling, and validation of a synthetic fault dataset for the air handling unit (AHU), one of the most common HVAC configurations found in the commercial building stock. Despite this being a common system, real-world time series data are scarce and usually do not span a wide range of weather conditions. Due to this limitation, two detailed AHU models, which included the single duct AHU and dual duct AHU developed in the Modelica language and HVACSIM+ were employed to carry out annual simulations of numerous common sensor faults, mechanical faults, and control sequence faults. The fault inclusive data were then validated by comparing fault effects on system performance to expected symptoms. We summarize the nature of each fault and their impacts under different weather and operation conditions. We report some lessons learnt during the efforts of validating the high volumes of the FDD data sets. Finally, we highlight considerations for FDD developers that may want to use this dataset to assess their algorithms’ performance and their improvement over time

Analysis of Automated Fault Detection and Diagnostics Records as an Indicator of HVAC Fault Prevalence: Methodology and Preliminary Results

Faults in commercial buildings can cause energy waste and other performance problems such as reduced occupant comfort, reduced equipment longevity, and increased noise. However, it is currently unknown how commonly faults occur in different equipment types. This paper describes a method to estimate the prevalence of faults in air handling units, air terminal units, and rooftop units and the use of three metrics for summarizing results. This method was developed by the authors as part of a study which includes data from several automated fault detection and diagnostics (AFDD) data providers, providing a large sample with a wide range of building types, geographical locations, and equipment types. This dataset includes fault diagnoses from thousands of buildings throughout the United States, as well as anonymized metadata describing the building and equipment characteristics. The number of fault records is on the order of 106. We describe here how the data from different data providers can be processed and unified using a common taxonomy, and illustrate three metrics that can provide insights using this type of data. The methods developed for this study are illustrated here with preliminary data. This work supports a multi-year, multi-institutional project that will provide insight into the drivers of fault prevalence; for example, whether prevalence is correlated with characteristics like building type, building size, and geographical location (including related factors like local climate and utility rates). We discuss some of the challenges of harmonizing disparate outputs from multiple AFDD providers, the usefulness of applying a unifying fault taxonomy, and provide preliminary figures that illustrate three fault prevalence metrics